Feb 27

An Inconvenient Video from COP-15 (2009) featuring DeSmog Blog’s Brendan Demelle.  This video was deemed soooo compelling by viewers that in the two years it’s been posted it had a whopping nine views when I scrounged it up from the YouTube dustbin.  An excerpt from Demelle discussing the state of journalism, and the rise of bloggers:

“…with the struggling economy which is hurting newsrooms there just aren’t as many resources to devote to deep investigative journalism than there used to be, and I think that’s why you see a rise in citizen journalism, people taking it upon themselves to go and try to figure out what the facts are and to report the facts.  Also, you know, one of the things that Danny mentioned is that journalists are, you know, taught to be objective and not to have a view.  I’d just say that you’re also taught to report facts, and not lies and misdeeds….”

He may say that, and yet I get the feeling that Brendan will only part with that fake 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy memo when we pry it from his proverbial cold, dead fingers.

Here’s the whole video.  DeMelle appears at 8:00…

1 person likes this post.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
Tagged with:
Feb 21

In his HuffPo confession, Peter Gleick made some statements that only bring up more questions:

At the beginning of 2012, I received an anonymous document in the mail describing what appeared to be details of the Heartland Institute’s climate program strategy. It contained information about their funders and the Institute’s apparent efforts to muddy public understanding about climate science and policy.

Gleick continues:

I do not know the source of that original document but assumed it was sent to me because of my past exchanges with Heartland and because I was named in it.

You sure about that Mr. Gleick?  Certainly the letter came in an envelope.  Certainly that envelope had a dated postmark indicating the post office that received it.  And certainly this postmarked envelope could possibly help defend yourself against the accusations that you produced the “Fake Memo”.  So if it did indeed come anonymously, wouldn’t any prudent person including you save the envelope?  Of course you would.  So please provide us a copy.

Also, Mr. Gleick, can you please tell us whether or not there was any accompanying cover letter in the envelope?  If so, surely you have that document too.  Please provide us a copy of that too, please.

We’ll be anxiously awaiting your reply, Peter.

14 people like this post.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
Feb 20

Peter Gleick, February, 2009, in a piece accusing the Heartland Institute of cherry-picking data to show a supposedly non-existent recent cooling trend:

Their irresponsible actions in this cherry-picking exercise substantially diminish even further Heartland’s claim to be any kind of honest broker of serious scientific skepticism on the topic of climate change.

The shoe is on the other foot, Peter.

4 people like this post.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
Tagged with:
Jun 03

Another alarmist jumps ship, and joins the realists/skeptics.

Steve Fielding is a Victorian Senator and the Federal parliamentary leader of the Family First Party in Australia. Sen. Fielding has recently had a change of heart brain on man-made climate change.

Previously he was in the alarmist camp, and had previously earned some alarmist cred by being awarded an Idiotic Comment of the Day Gong at the Australian Climate Madness blog for this bit of insanity:

DIVORCE adds to the impact of global warming as couples switch to wasteful single lifestyles, Family First senator Steve Fielding says.

He told a Senate hearing on today that divorce led to a “resource-inefficient lifestyle” and it would be better for the planet if couples stayed married.

When couples separate, they need more rooms, more electricity and more water, which increases their carbon footprint.

“We understand that there is a social problem (with divorce), but now we’re seeing there is also environmental impact as well on the footprint,” Senator Fielding said.

The senator has now changed his tune, and even went half way around the world to DC for The Heartland Institute’s Third International Conference on Climate Change to marinate himself in some healthy skepticism.  Fielding has changed his tune, saying at the conference:

I suppose I’m in the camp of what people call the realists or the skeptics.

And goes on to ask:

Is man the problem? And if not what are we doing?

Hat tip: Climate Change Fraud

Be the first to like.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
Tagged with:
Jun 18

Al Gore in An Inconvenient Truth:

Isn’t there a disagreement among scientists about whether the problem is real or not? Actually, not really. There was a massive study of every scientific article in a peer reviewed article written on global warming in the last ten years. They took a big sample of 10 percent, 928 articles. And you know the number of those that disagreed with the scientific consensus that were causing global warming and that is a serious problem out of the 928…Zero.

Well, Gore lied about that. But, that’s nothing new.

The Heartland Institute will publish in its July 1, 2008 issue of Environment News a list of peer-reviewed scientific studies that question the validity of anthropogenic global warming. Here’s the the first part of three lists of the peer-reviewed studies.

It’s GORE LIED’s contention that “peer reviewed” usually means liberals rubber-stamping the biased studies of other liberals – because, like education and journalism, the field of science is a liberal magnet.

So, what’s going on here? Well, of the 61 studies in this first of three parts, only one was published prior to 1990, only ten were published between 1991-2000, and fifty of the studies were published after 2001. I guess the “peers” can only put their finger in the dike for so long until they get inundated with a flood of studies contradicting Gore’s claims.

It’s often been said that climate science is in its infancy, but it appears that the godfather of anthropogenic global warming, Al Gore, has put climate science on a trajectory toward adolescence, and the science is behaving much like any rebellious adolescent would.

Gore lied.

Be the first to like.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
May 31

Gore lied.

1 person likes this post.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
preload preload preload