Comments on: Pot calls kettle black: In a letter to the WSJ, Michael Mann claims science journals should remain unpolluted by politics

By: Climate Poofters Under Attack–Bad Science Gone Awry « Gloucester on the Ditch

Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:05:34 +0000

By: Dr. Ross Taylor

Dr. Ross Taylor — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:38:13 +0000

“Society relies upon the integrity of the scientific literature to inform sound policy. It is thus a serious offense to compromise the peer-review system in such a way as to allow anyone—including proponents of climate change science—to promote unsubstantiated claims and distortions.”

Er, Michael, I think someone needs to quietly point out to you that most of us have read your e-mails now.

An excellent and very detailed analysis of the incriminating e-mails is found here:

http://assassinationscience.com/climategate/

By: nevket240

nevket240 — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:39:06 +0000

Mann is starting to come across a spoilt Jester jousting with windmills of his own making.
Isn’t calling people ‘deniers’ a political effort, surely it isn’t scientific?
Quoting John Holdren is reprehensible. He is trying to give a genocidal Marxist lunatic some sort of street cred by inferring Holdren is a higher authority.

‘rigorous professional journals’ is surely a misnomer. The only thing ‘rigorous’ has been their efforts to stifle dissenting publications.

Mann is ‘Big business’ lackey who has been caught being naughty & is trying to cover his ar&e by dropping names.
regards