GORE LIED has fired up our staff computer modeling contraption, input the latest Rasmussen Reports data on the public’s belief in man-made global warming, and has produced a computer model which is showing the imminent demise of any belief in man-made global warming.
Rasmussen Reports has reported that the public’s belief in man-made global warming has decreased from 47% to 34% in just one year.
The GORE LIED computer model below shows that at the current rate of loss of belief in man-made global warming that such belief will be virtually non-existent by 2020 (with the exception of Al Gore, James Hansen, Michael Mann, Joe Romm, and a few other assorted dead-enders).
Also, evidence of a positive feedback trend has caused many experts to believe that the actual rate of loss of belief in man-made global warming is happening even faster than this model is predicting, and that the world may be completely free of belief in man-made global warming by as early as 2015.
Possibly Related Posts:
- As precipitation observations run contrary to climate model predictions, scientist shamelessly concludes: ‘People can go out and refine the theory.’
- Astronomers: ‘Sun’s output may decline significantly inducing another little ice age on the Earth’
- As temperatures continue to fall, letter writer suggests rebranding global warming yet again: ‘man-made atmosphere change’
- While records are broken for low temperatures in Al Gore’s hometown, the Nashville Public Library has 7 of 8 An Inconvenient Truth DVDs available
- Al Gore / AIT Index, Vol. 14: Globally averaged temperatures have plunged .74°F (.39°C) since Al Gore released An Inconvenient Truth
18 Responses to “GORE LIED computer model shows public belief in man-made global warming disappearing by 2020”
Trackbacks
Comments
-
Shouldn’t we keep some burnt-brain egomaniacs’ specimen in museums to show them to the new next ice-age generations, in order to learn how to disarm arrogants?
-
-
Klockarman says:
Roy Spencer said:
Very clever! I like it!
Thanks for your enthusiastic comment, Dr. Spencer. I’m honored that you read the blog.
-
-
Gavin says:
Great article, really cute
-
Gavin said:
Great article, really cute
Thanks for reading the blog, and also for your kind comment.
-
-
Dubl says:
Brilliant!!
Two things I love about this:
1. It looks like a reverse version of the equally shoddy “hockey stick”. There is nothing more sour than the taste of your own medicine.
2. You could probably do a better statistical validation on the predictions of this model than you could on actual climate models. Rasmussen’s lifeblood is the accuracy of their statistics. The same cannot be said for the IPCC. Once again there is nothing more sour than the taste of your own medecine.
Think we’ll see this in Nature any time soon? How ’bout the cover of the WaPo or NYTimes? You laugh, but the fact that we won’t is what truly settles the debate for me…
-
Dubl said:
There is nothing more sour than the taste of your own medicine.
Exactly.
Regarding your proposed statistical validation: I just did some simple math on my cell phone’s calculator to extrapolate out the short-term trend until the belief in man-made global warming was nearly non-existent. Turns out that year is 2020, or earlier if those pesky positive feedbacks wreak havoc.
Thanks for reading the blog, and taking the time to comment.
-
-
Thanatos Savehn says:
Brilliant. If predicting the future based only on a sliver of recent data and only that data that supporting your theory is sound methodology (and this era’s courts of inquisition say it is) then you’ve come up with a revelation worthy of the front page of the NYTimes.
-
Thanatos Savehn said:
Brilliant. If predicting the future based only on a sliver of recent data and only that data that supporting your theory is sound methodology (and this era’s courts of inquisition say it is) then you’ve come up with a revelation worthy of the front page of the NYTimes.
Brilliant? Wow. Thanks.
Thanks for reading the blog, and for taking the time to comment.
-
-
Are you sure that’s not a graph of the global temperature trend for the next 12 years?
-
G Hamid said:
Are you sure that’s not a graph of the global temperature trend for the next 12 years?
No. It’s not, but it’s no surprise that belief in man-made global warming trends with the temperatures.
-
-
bill-tb says:
So all we have left is cap-N-tax …
-
john says:
I think everyone who isn’t in liberal denial knows what Al Gore is. Lets include the idiots taht awarded him the nobel whatever.
-
JSmith says:
Absolutely brilliant! Far more scientific than Gore et al can produce.
-
Girma says:
It is extremely hard for me to believe that the heat wave from the earth is trapped by 1 particle of CO2 in 2500 particles of the atmosphere, instead of escaping through the remaining 2499 air particles. I find this unbelievable.
[...] the Rasmussen report, here is the (hockey stick) graph that proves Gore Lied ! GORE LIED computer model shows public belief in man-made global warming disappearing by 2020 | GORE … __________________ If you don’t like what global warming alarmists are saying, don’t worry; [...]
[...] in man-made global warming had shrunk from 47% to 34% in the past year. That data resulted in the GORE LIED computer model showing that at the current rate of loss of belief in man-made global warming that such belief [...]
[...] the GORE LIED computer model shows the future public belief in man-made global warming will plummet from 34% in 2009 to 25% in [...]