Nov 24

The CRU leak has kept The Daily Bayonet very, very busy.  On the heels of it’s first snark-filled CRU Round-Up, here’s #2:

The CRU hack/leak story is moving fast, and it’s tough to keep up, but fear not, for another bonus round-up is here to help.

Did the BBC hide the story for a month?  Did Phil Jones know he’d be compared to a famous but unpleasant Presidential emission?  You’ll be surprised what you can learn.  Oh, and I turned up the snark-o-matic, enjoy.

The Leak/Hack

BBC weatherman Paul Hudson confirms the leaked emails are genuine.  He knows this because they were emailed to him in October.  The obvious questions are, who emailed it to him, and why did Hudson not think evidence of corruption and collusion worthy of reporting?

Was it a hack, or a leak?  Maybe it was neither.

Lord Lawson, Thatcherite ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer, demands a public enquiry into the exposed malpractice and deception of the motley CRU.

Sen. Inhofe makes me look like a genius and demands an investigation.  Thanks, Jim.

Pile on!  The CEI sues NASA/GISS for ignoring FOIA requests.  For any lefties reading, this is a face palm moment.  Go ahead, we’ll wait.

not the WWF againnot the WWF again

If it was a leak, whodunnit?

Malkin notes that enquiries are being demanded on both sides of the Atlantic. Popcorn, bring me it.

It’s the fraud, stupid.

The Inconvenient Emails/Data

Revenge of the nerds: a programmer trawls through the leaked CRU code and giggles mightily at what he finds.

Settled science, what science? James Taranto on the revelations of corruption.

Revenge of the nerds part deux: a statistician digs into the code, and is unimpressed.

Viscount Monkton reviewed the data and emails and determines that the motley CRU are criminals. Ouch, don’t sugar coat it or anything.

The CRU leak undermines scientist’s credibility and the IPCC’s ability to push junk science at a very bad time for the alarmists as they pack their bags for Hopenchangen in Copenhagen.

hopenchangenThe motley CRU made ASSes of themselves.

Freakonomicist Dubner see the ugly side of science.

Warmist believers cannot believe what they are finding out about the people they trusted were selling them, and boy, are they upset.

Do Jones et al’s repeated statements about denying FOI requests mean that the data set wasn’t lost, but deleted?

You’re not done yet, you’re only getting started, but you’ll have to visit The Daily Bayonet for Hippies Heads Exploding and the CRU hack/leak Hottie – and YES there is such a thing.

4 people like this post.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share

Comments are closed.

preload preload preload