Nov 29

climategateal gore

Yesterday, WattsUpWithThat noted that the search term “climategate” had surged past “global warming” in the number of search results found by Google.

At that time yesterday, “climategate” returned 10,400,000 results. One day later, “climategate” returns13,200,000 results, which means that “climategate” has now surpassed even “Al Gore” in search results.  The former Vice-President and global warming huckster is at a mere 11,300,000.

This is even more astonishing when it is considered that this has happened in the midst of the mainstream media mostly ignoring the Climategate story.  In the free market of information that is the Internet, you can’t keep a good story down.

6 people like this post.

Possibly Related Posts:


13 Responses to “Milestone: After surpassing ‘global warming’, ‘climategate’ now surges past ‘Al Gore’ in Google search results”

  1. bill-tb says:

    Near 50 million hits on Bing, 13 million on google — You decide who is scamming now.


  2. brian lemon says:

    theres a debate in Toronto tomorrow that holds great promise for more revelations. Climategate cannot be ignored in this event.
    I’m travelling – perhaps you can check it out.

    On the panel is the leader of the Green Party of Canada – Elizabeth May who is very good at making incorrect statements and exaggerating facts that the two Realists are sure to hammer her on.
    She’s pompous and almost always is incorrect – but she is never in doubt.

    With Monbiot on there – this may be paradigm changing – someone has to get the transcript.


    • Klockarman says:

      Thanks, Brian. I’ll try to check it out. Hopefully they will post video other than just the live webcast mentioned on the site.


  3. MrCannuckistan says:

    I prefer to use Google Trends. They plot two search terms against each other for frequency over time. Click below for the comparison of Al Gore and ClimateGate.



  4. The medical profession has confirmed that a poison contained in a United Nations variant of fudge was the cause of a debilitating brain disease among scientists, now termed Climate Wars Syndrome (CWS).

    The disease was secretly suspected by sceptical scientists to have spread rapaciously among the scientific community for two decades and to have taken a terrible grip over the reasoning powers of many. Victims can be identified by their green and alarmist complexion. Other side effects include an irrational hatred of mankind and a Tourette syndrome-like verbal abuse of anyone who uses fossil fuels. Threats of violence may occur. The world first learned of these sensational developments from the Internet on Friday November 20th 2009. The story broke that both the underlying cause of CWS and an effective treatment had been discovered by the due diligence of one man working at the UK’s Climate Research Unit (CRU). A vast community of Internet surfers soon memorialised these profound events by naming them, ‘Climategate.’

    From leaked documents we understand that the catalyst for this epoch change in science occurred when a climatologist and self-taught computer programmer known only as ‘Harry’ was sat at his laboratory computer chewing on some fudge. Only after three long years working on this problem and in a sudden eureka moment, did it finally dawn on him. In Harry’s hands was the cause of brain fog mystery.

    “F**k! It’s the fudge! It’s serial!” he cried.

    Inadvertently, Harry has become the hero the public associate with solving one of the great mysteries of modern science. Since those findings have appeared on the Internet the world has quickly accepted that it was the UN’s foul fudge that caused scientists to suffer this dreadful disease.

    Meanwhile, epidemiologists and clinicians have been quick to identify the hallucinagenic properties of the offending fudge to further unravel the mystery. Incredibly, the fudge has been found to contain a psychotropic substance that acts primarily upon the central nervous system where it alters brain function, resulting in changes in perception, mood, consciousness and behavior leading patients to feel delusions of grandeur and a sense of spiritual purpose in their lives.

    It appears lone-wolf Harry, wiling away his time in the CRU laboratory subliminally faced the truth and by a process of ‘cognitive dissonance,’ shocked himself out of the effects of the psychotropic intoxicant, a drug now known to cause the hallucinogenic appearance of a mythical beast known as, ‘Man-Bear-Pig’ (MBP). Other experts who have replicated Harry’s experiments confirm the efficacy of the cognitive dissonance reasoning process as a cure. Apparently, most recovering ‘addicts’ (for this fudge-eating was clearly an addiction) soon notice a change starting with improvements in the appearance of their eyes which lose their tainted green colouration.

    Other convalescing climatologists, that body of scientists identified as the worst fudge sufferers, are reporting the same side effects as Harry. Symptoms include anxiety, guilt, shame, anger, embarrassment, stress, and other negative emotional states that torment the patient. Epidemiologists have coined the name ’Climate War Syndrome’ (CWS) to describe the fudge-induced malady. Both ‘Climategate’ and ’Climate War Syndrome’ (CWS) have fast entered common usage giving a new handle on what was one of the great mysteries of our time.

    Of course, like any serious disease, there will always be patients who won’t respond well to treatment. Those worst cases permeated with the deepest shade of green are believed to be James Hansen, Michael ‘upside down’ Mann and Phil Jones whom, its feared, may all need to be quarantined in isolation for several years.


  5. […] had been passed by “Climategate” in the total number of search results.  Next, GORE LIED  reported that as the number of search results had continued to climb, “Climategate” had even […]


  6. Willis Eschenbach has produced a stunning exposure of the climate records con over on WUWT. His full summary can be found here:

    Basically, Eschenbach shows the following:

    First off we know that there are only three main global temperature datasets that the world’s climatologists can study. One is at the CRU, Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, where we’ve been trying to get access to the raw numbers. One is at NOAA/GHCN, the Global Historical Climate Network. The final one is at NASA/GISS, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

    These centres, before they let other scientists touch the numbers, process them to “homogenize” and smooth out any contamination that could occur from sudden changes in local circumstances ( eg a major road being built next door).

    These three global temperature records are known as CRU, GISS, and GHCN. Both GISS and CRU, however, get almost all of their raw data from GHCN. Surprise, surprise all three centres produce very similar global historical temperature records from the raw data.

    From the leaked Climategate emails we know climatologists admitted to some kind of fiddling – they ‘fudge’ and ‘hide the decline.’ For over three years they admit they subverted and denied FOI requests so that no outsiders could see just how they actually ‘homogenize’ the raw data.

    Researcher, Willis Eschenbach, spent three long years studying the Australian measuring centres to try to understand how climatologists who compile the CRU, GISS, and GHCN homogenized the Aussie data sets to calculate the final numbers they hand out the the rest of the world’s scientists. What Eschenbach found is truly shocking.

    Like anyone else who has read the leaked CRU emails, Eschenbach, knew CRU climatologists basically just use the Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) dataset for its raw data. So he looked very closely at the GHCN dataset. What he was able to prove from analysing the Australian measuring centres was that the final figures that the CRU give to the IPCC are “adjusted” upwards by 2.0 degrees C. all across the board with no apparent reason or justification whatsoever.

    Eschenbach focused his investigartions on an unexplained homogenization at a key temperature station known as ‘Darwin Zero’ where the raw data showed temperatures falling at 0.7 Celcius per century. But after CRU ‘homogenized’ them the temperatures shot up to show warming at 1.2 Celcius per century – an adjustment of over two degrees per century with nothing in the records to explain why Darwin needed to be hiked up like this. What angered him even more was that there was no apparent reason to ‘homogenize’ any of the data from the Darwin region because CRU had possession of temperature readings from no less than five other nearby sites covering Darwin from 1941 onwards. Despite the fact they all agreed almost exactly with each other someone at CRU decided to tag on another whopping two degrees even though all Darwin’s records were apparently already highly reliable and didn’t need ‘homogenization.’

    Eschenbach concluded that he has found “indisputable evidence that the “homogenized” data has been changed to fit someone’s preconceptions about whether the earth is warming.”

    This makes perfects sense now as to why CRU and NASA, who for several years have unlawfully blocked every freedom of information request to properly and independently audit their ‘homogenizing’ techniques.

    Climategate has exposed the scam for what it is – a bunch of tricksters adding a few degrees here and there to the true temperature records to falsely show a warming trend which merely exists in their imaginations. Because if they can show their government fund givers that there is a climate ‘crisis’ then they will not only be given further research grants but will also be giving the politicians a perfect excuse to raise green taxes.


  7. brian lemon says:

    The Alarmists are now denying. Yesterday at Hopenagen the speaker said tens of thousands of scientists . . .
    But really, there are only 3 dealing with the data sets.
    This story has legs – MSM is picking it up and it is accompanying almost every story.
    If the CRU leader’s actions are properly accounted for it might be the end of the road for them. The media mostly don’t care what side they’re on, just gettign the biggest story.


  8. My husband would be amazed this website. We were recently discussing about this. lol


  9. Rick says:

    I bet “googlegate” will soon join “climategate” (except on


  10. Anonymous says:

    Voici une f


  11. […] wannabe hippies with a big jet, tried to suppress the rising tide of Climategate.  Inconveniently, the people will not be suppressed.  Bing’s autosuggest has no compunction about coughing up Climategate after only entering […]


preload preload preload