The Oregonian reports on a tragedy that struck in Southeast Portland on Wednesday:
Firefighters responded to an apparent carbon monoxide poisoning in Southeast Portland late Wednesday that left a man dead and a woman severely injured.
Investigators think the incident was caused by carbon monoxide leaking from a natural gas heater that was not properly ventilated.
Although it went unreported in the web edition of this story, my dead tree edition included the sobering irony:
According to neighbors, the [victims] were friendly but private, and concerned for the environment: [the male victim] had recently announced he would give up his vehicles in an effort to reduce his carbon footprint.
This tragedy illustrates the absurdity of where this world is headed with its demonization and regulation of molecules. The environmental alarmists have waged a mostly successful campaign to smear the good reputation of carbon dioxide (CO2), a harmless trace gas which is essential for life to exist on earth, and convinced many well-meaning citizens (such as the above victim) that it is mandatory to reduce their emissions of CO2 lest we unleash an imagined climatic apocalypse. As a result, last week the EPA designated CO2 as a “pollutant”.
Meantime, there’s another molecule with one less oxygen atom, carbon monoxide (CO), that is indeed deadly to humans, in fact it’s “the leading cause of accidental poisoning deaths in North America.”
Which begs the question: If we are going to spend our tax dollars protecting citizens from deadly molecules wouldn’t it be smarter to spend more money on providing carbon monoxide alarms than spending that same money on subsidizing alternative energy in the name of limiting emissions of another molecule that is plant food?
My condolences and prayers are with the family of the victim, and his wife.
Possibly Related Posts:
- Study: ‘Modern high-yield farming lowered the amount of greenhouse gases pumped into the Earth’s atmosphere toward the end of the 20th Century by a massive amount’
- Domino Effect: Utah, then Texas, and now Virginia challenging EPA’s greenhouse gas regulations
- Utah legislative panel digs its heels in against EPA’s CO2 regs; passes resolution mentioning ‘flawed climate data’, and critical of $7B ‘climate change gravy train’
- BREAKING: Dems join effort to block EPA’s greenhouse gas regulations
- Scientist’s Letter to the Editor: ‘It is simply not logical that controlling a single (and miniscule, by volume) variable such as atmospheric CO2 will allow us to bend the entire global climate to our will’