Paul Ehrlich has a well-earned reputation for predicting imminent doom from a variety of perceived man-made causes. It seems he’s now predicting doom for he and his fellow warmists:
The integrity of climate research has taken a very public battering in recent months. Scientists must now emphasize the science, while acknowledging that they are in a street fight.
Climate scientists are on the defensive, knocked off balance by a re-energized community of global-warming deniers who, by dominating the media agenda, are sowing doubts about the fundamental science. Most researchers find themselves completely out of their league in this kind of battle because it’s only superficially about the science. The real goal is to stoke the angry fires of talk radio, cable news, the blogosphere and the like, all of which feed off of contrarian story lines and seldom make the time to assess facts and weigh evidence. Civility, honesty, fact and perspective are irrelevant.
Worse, the onslaught seems to be working: some polls in the United States and abroad suggest that it is eroding public confidence in climate science at a time when the fundamental understanding of the climate system, although far from complete, is stronger than ever. Ecologist Paul Ehrlich at Stanford University in California says that his climate colleagues are at a loss about how to counter the attacks. “Everyone is scared shitless, but they don’t know what to do,” he says.
Hat tip: Marc Morano at Climate Depot
Possibly Related Posts:
- “Global warming without warming”: Global warming realism leads mainstream newspaper above the fold
- Fellow man-made global warming skeptic blogger declares victory; puts blog on ice
- The bubble of climate change group-think burst in a cooling world
- Climate change consensus: Exposing the great ‘catastrophe’ myth
- Doubling down vs. going all in: Card playing strategy and the man-made global warming movement