Oct 30

This is a must watch video, and be sure to stick around to the very end where Lord Monckton issues this challenge:

Al baby, if you really think that you want to raise the profile of this issue, then why don’t you agree to debate with me on international television – the fees we’ll earn apart from anything else would be enormous, and I know you’d love that because money seems to stick to you very rapidly – I want you to face me in a debate about global warming, and if you don’t dare I want you to remain silent about subject forever, from now on.  Are you a coward, or will you step up to the plate? Are you an arm-chair quarterback, or are you going to get suited up, and get onto that field?

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Hat tip: Watts Up With That

2 people like this post.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
Tagged with:
Jun 30

Be the first to like.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
Tagged with:
May 27

Earlier today on The Glenn Beck Program’s Spotlight on Science:

GLENN: We’re going to do a control case, here, just a little control case. Just hypothetically speaking here on a control case. Hypothetically speaking, a Republican, a Republican chairperson, Republican chairperson of, let’s say an energy and commerce chair decides to present a bill and for fun let’s say it’s a global warming bill, and in this Republican global warming bill let’s say that it was close to 1,000 pages long and it is of, quote, the utmost importance, even quote, especially if we, you know, hate mongers actually care about the planet. Remember, hypothetically you care about the planet, and this is the utmost we’ve got to pass this bill. Let’s just say that that Republican chairperson was confronted with a detail from the bill that he wrote. He was the author. Remember, he was the author. So now let’s say that this author of a global warming bill that is of the utmost importance to save the Earth forgot some of the information in it. Would this oversight by a Republican chairperson on a bill which he authored be considered acceptable by the Democrats or the Republicans? I’m going to go with big fat no on that one. But for fun let’s say this whole situation hypothetically was a Democratic chairperson of the energy and commerce committee who wrote the bill, wasn’t aware of its contents, instead blindly followed the scientists from the United Nations. Yeah, but that would never happen, right?

VOICE: Before I ask the question to counsel, did you know that was in this bill?

VOICE: Are you asking me?

VOICE: Yes, sir.

VOICE: Well, I certainly don’t claim to know everything that’s in this bill. I know that we left it to we relied very heavily on the scientists, on the IPCC and others and the consensus that they have that there is a problem of global warming, it’s having an impact and that we need to try to reduce it by the amounts that they think we need to achieve in order to avoid some of the consequences. That’s what I know, but I don’t know the details.

Continue reading »

Be the first to like.

Possibly Related Posts:


Share
Tagged with:
preload preload preload